|
He committed the murder.
Or did he?
November 29, 1998
By Bill Moushey, Post-Gazette Staff Writer
Thomas Farese was no choir boy.
He was connected by marriage to New Yorks Colombo crime family and had been
involved in his share of tangles with the law. But he was no contract killer, he insisted
in federal court, even though federal prosecutors told a federal magistrate he had
confessed about a murder for hire to a government informant, who told federal agents about
the confession from prison.
Prosecutors read the informants incriminating statement in court, and Farese was
held for trial. In 1994, he was convicted.
It would be two years before his attorneys learned that the same informant had also
given government agents an almost identical statement when implicating another man in the
same murder. Prosecutors neglected to tell Farese or the judge about the contradiction.
Fareses attorney, Jon May, was outraged. "Increasingly in this circuit,
agents and prosecutors have adopted the philosophy that whatever means are necessary to
obtain a conviction are justified by the good that will result to society," he said
in the 1996 appeal of Fareses conviction. "This has resulted in perjury by
government agents and the suppression of favorable evidence and the making of false
statements in closing arguments by prosecutors."
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, saying it was "appalled by the moral
blindness exhibited by the assistant supervisors and division chiefs at the U.S.
Attorneys Office. Prosecutors are held to a higher standard for a reason. They are
given awesome powers. If they cannot be trusted, we are all at risk."
Farese was released on bond in early 1996 as the government decided whether to refile
charges. In early December 1997, the bond was rescinded, and he went back to prison. He
was released again on bond in early 1998.
Finally, Farese agreed to a plea bargain: six years in prison on charges relating to a
strip club he operated in Florida. He said he agreed to the deal because prosecutors
threatened to indict his wife if he did not accept the plea bargain.
|